Legal Opinion

Siemsen v. Oakland, San Leandro, & Haywards Electric Railway

California Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1901No. S.F. No. 1679PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

— Plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries sustained by him, through the derailment of one of defendant’s electric cars moving upon a street in the city of Oakland. The cause was tried before .a jury, and the verdict and judgment were for plaintiff. In due time defendant moved for a new trial, upon the grounds of misconduct of the jury, insufficiency of the evidence, and errors of law occurring at the trial. The court granted the motion for a new trial upon the sole ground of the misconduct of juror Long, stating further, that all other grounds of the motion had been examined and found…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hegeman v. . the Western Railroad CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Saltzman v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API