Siemsen v. Oakland, San Leandro, & Haywards Electric Railway
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
— Plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries sustained by him, through the derailment of one of defendant’s electric cars moving upon a street in the city of Oakland. The cause was tried before .a jury, and the verdict and judgment were for plaintiff. In due time defendant moved for a new trial, upon the grounds of misconduct of the jury, insufficiency of the evidence, and errors of law occurring at the trial. The court granted the motion for a new trial upon the sole ground of the misconduct of juror Long, stating further, that all other grounds of the motion had been examined and found…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hegeman v. . the Western Railroad CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Saltzman v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.