Legal Opinion

Sherwood v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1932No. Docket No. 8331PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTERIDGE, J., pro tem.

In this action to recover damages resultant from an assault and battery, the verdict of the jury was initially in favor of plaintiff and respondent as against defendant and appellant for $2,500' actual damages, together with an award of $1,000' punitive damages. Subsequently, on motion for a new trial and as a required condition precedent to the denial thereof, the trial court exacted of plaintiff a remission of $1,000 of the amount awarded as actual damages, as well as $495 of the sum assessed as punitive damages. Plaintiff having filed her consent thereto, judgment in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Siemsen v. Oakland, San Leandro, & Haywards Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bloomberg v. LaventhalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Smith v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Fererira v. SilveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hughes v. Hearst Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Phipps v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Baker v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Brower v. ArnsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API