Legal Opinion

Roth v. Shell Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1960No. Civ. 6292PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Plaintiffs, respondents and cross-appellants, husband and wife, brought this action against defendant, appellant and cross-respondent corporation for claimed damages for trespasses occurring on July 27 and July 29, 1957. A third cause of action for breach of contract was dismissed by plaintiffs.

Plaintiff, Mrs. Roth, formerly Frances Felty, had, for a number of years, operated a service station, a restaurant and occupied an apartment on her property in Upland, selling Shell products under a dealer sales contract with defendant Shell Oil Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Finney v. LockhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Acadia, California, Ltd. v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API