Legal Opinion

Hust v. Moore-Mccormick Lines, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1946PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This case is here for the second time. It was an action under § 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, 46 U. S. C. A., § 688, commonly known as the Jones Act, brought by a seaman to recover damages for personal injury sustained by him while engaged in the performance of his duties on a government owned vessel. In the Circuit Court the plaintiff was awarded a verdict by the jury of $35,000.00. Motions of the defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial, the latter on the ground of excessive damages, were denied. The defendant appealed from the judgment to this court,…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Rogers v. SaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sandow v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Geris v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API