Legal Opinion
State v. Hood
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 29, 1936No. 14364PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fisi-iburnE.
The defendants were indicted, tried, and convicted in the Court of General Sessions for Clarendon County for unlawfully obstructing an inland stream and water of this State by placing therein a net for the stoppage and collecting of fish, on March 26, 1935. The undisputed testimony shows that the defendants were fishing with nets at Shell Landing on the Santee River, which is a muddy water stream. They were charged with violating Section 1817, Code of Laws 1932, Vol. 1, which, in so far as pertinent to the issue presented by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Buchanan v. State TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Locke v. DillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- E. M. Matthews Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Doe v. MarionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Bell v. South Carolina State Highway Dept.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Justice v. PantryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- City of Myrtle Beach v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.