Legal Opinion

Doe v. Marion

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 2007No. 26323PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

John Doe (Petitioner) brought an action on behalf of his minor son, James Doe, to recover damages arising from the sexual abuse of James Doe by Robert Francis Marion, Jr., M.D. Petitioner also alleged Carol Graf, M.D. and Carol Graf, M.D. & Associates (Respondents) were negligent in failing to report to authorities or warn future victims of Dr. Marion’s predilection for child molestation. The trial court disagreed and dismissed the case. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Doe v. Marion, 361 S.C. 463, 605 S.E.2d 556 (Ct.App.2004). We granted Petitioner’s request for a writ of certiorari to review…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Doe v. Bishop of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Fabian v. LindsaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Sloan Construction Co. v. Southco Grassing, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Capital City Insurance v. BP Staff, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API