Justice v. Pantry
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge:
Jay Justice filed two lawsuits against The Pantry and others (Defendants), under S.C.Code Ann. § 32-1-20 (1991), to recover gambling debts incurred by his mother and sister while playing video poker machines. 1 The trial court dismissed both suits on Defendants’ motion, ruling: 1.) Justice failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP; and 2.) section 32-1-20 was impliedly repealed by enactment of the Video Game Machines Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 12-21-2770 to 2809 (Supp.1997). Justice appeals. We reverse and remand.
I. ISSUES
A. Did…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Russell v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Brown v. LeveretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Johnson v. Collins Entertainment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Mullinax v. J.M. Brown Amusement Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- United Educational Distributors, LLC v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Proctor v. Whitlark & Whitlark, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.