Legal Opinion

Justice v. Pantry

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 26, 1998No. 2787PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge:

Jay Justice filed two lawsuits against The Pantry and others (Defendants), under S.C.Code Ann. § 32-1-20 (1991), to recover gambling debts incurred by his mother and sister while playing video poker machines. 1 The trial court dismissed both suits on Defendants’ motion, ruling: 1.) Justice failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP; and 2.) section 32-1-20 was impliedly repealed by enactment of the Video Game Machines Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 12-21-2770 to 2809 (Supp.1997). Justice appeals. We reverse and remand.

I. ISSUES

A. Did…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Russell v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Brown v. LeveretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Johnson v. Collins Entertainment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Mullinax v. J.M. Brown Amusement Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. United Educational Distributors, LLC v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Proctor v. Whitlark & Whitlark, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API