Belgrade v. National American Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
As a result of vandalism, the plaintiffs suffered damages in an amount in excess of $9,000 to a residence and the carpets and drapes therein. They sought recovery for their loss from the defendant insurance company under the terms of a policy of insurance. The amount of loss was not in dispute but the defendant denied liability because of a provision of the policy as to the effect of a vacancy of the property. The trial court rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiffs have appealed therefrom.
In the policy it was provided that, with respect to the property covered, the appellants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Foley v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Mauck v. Northwestern National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TRB Investments, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Inglis v. Operating Engineers Local Union No. 12California Supreme Court · 1962
- Hung Van Ong v. Fire Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hung Van Ong v. Fire Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.