Legal Opinion

TRB Investments, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2006No. S136690PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

This case involves a property insurance policy that withdraws coverage for specified perils while the insured premises are vacant. The pertinent exclusion contains an exception stating that buildings “under construction” are not considered vacant. The question before us concerns whether the work being performed on the building at the time of the loss rendered the building “under construction” such that the vacancy exclusion does not apply.

Plaintiffs argue their efforts meant that the structure was “under construction” and therefore covered under the policy when a water heater…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Aydin Corp. v. First State InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. County of San Diego v. Ace Property & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Wilkes CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Minkler v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Donohue v. AMN Services, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. Advocare International, LP v. Horizon Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. Efund Capital Partners v. PlessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API