Legal Opinion

Furtado v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1976No. Civ. 15566PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Malcolm B. Furtado (“plaintiff”) brought this action seeking a declaration of liability against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. (“Metropolitan”) based upon a policy of life insurance on the life of plaintiff’s son, under which plaintiff was the named beneficiary. Following a trial by the court, judgment was rendered in favor of Metropolitan. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Facts

On February 12, 1973, Metropolitan issued a policy of life insurance with a face value of $ 15,000 to and on the life of plaintiff’s son Vincent E. Furtado, then 18 years of age.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ortega Rock Quarry v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. McBride v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Kavruck v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Weldon v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Transport Indemnity Co. v. AloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API