Legal Opinion

Kavruck v. Blue Cross of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 2003No. B144463PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from summary judgment in favor of Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) in a class action. The class is made up of subscribers whose health insurance policies were changed so that their premiums were no longer based on their initial enrollment age but on their attained age at the time of renewal. We conclude there are triable issues of material fact whether Blue Cross breached these contracts, precluding summary judgment. We reverse the judgment. We affirm the order denying class certification as to the causes of action for fraud, negligent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  2. Palacin v. All State InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Gerald Hughes Patrick Hughes v. William Wheeler, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. BancInsure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API