Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Ince

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1998No. 960298PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice.

The Utah State Bar (“the Bar”) appeals from a district court order rejecting the Bar’s request for the disbarment of Paul R. Ince. In its findings of fact, the district court determined that Ince had committed not less than nineteen major acts of misconduct over a fifteen-month period, including misappropriating law firm and client funds for his own use and benefit, forging documents to conceal an illegal transfer of pension funds, and fading to disclose his misconduct to a subsequent employer. Despite finding that the generally appropriate level of discipline fixed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Matter of Discipline of BabilisUtah Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brussow v. Utah State BarUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Discipline of Alvin LundgrenUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In Re the Discipline of CoreyUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In Re the Discipline of EnnengaUtah Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API