Legal Opinion
Rose v. Office of Prof'l Conduct
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 2017No. Case No. 20151037PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 The district court disbarred Susan Rose for violations of Utah's Rules of Professional Conduct in cases Rose handled in both federal and state courts. Her disbarment came after the district court struck her answer and entered default judgment against her. The disbarment did not come suddenly, or by surprise. Over the course of several years, Rose had received multiple warnings from multiple tribunals. These tribunals *137 called her motion practice "bizarre," "inscrutable," "dilatory," "frivolous," "legally meritless," "wholly superfluous,"…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. KiddUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Cougar Canyon v. The Cypress FundUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- O Connor v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Fritsche v. Deer Valley RidgeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.