Gregory v. Freeman
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUND PORT, Judge.
Memorandum-Decision and Order
THE MOTION
The respondent has moved to dismiss this action because: (1) the petitioner has failed to allege the grounds on which the court's jurisdiction depends; (2) it appears upon the face of the complaint that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter; and (3) the complaint fails to join the United States of America and members of the New York State Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committee as indispensable parties.
THE COMPLAINT
The complaint herein seeks an order annulling a determination of the Cayuga County Committee…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawaii v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Corpstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Mario Mercado E Hijos (Central Rufina) v. Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Rose v. McNamaraDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Simons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- United States v. GomesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1971