Corpstein v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
The United States brought these actions to recover penalties alleged to be due as a result of wheat grown by defendants during the years 1955 and 1956 in excess of their farm marketing quotas as defined by the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended. 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq. The cases involve the same facts and identical issues of law, and have been consolidated for disposition. These appeals are from summary judgments in favor of the United States.
The defendants contend that the Act is unconstitutional. The power of Congress to regulate agriculture in the manner it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Ethan Stangland, United States of America v. Max MunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Lindsay B. Shafer, Lewis Shafer, Joseph Shafer, and Lewis Shafer, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- James Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Rigby v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Morrow v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.