Legal Opinion
Rose v. McNamara
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 23, 1963No. 33891PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.
This is a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment in the nature of mandamus. The defendant has moved to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. From the complaint, the following facts appear:
Plaintiff was the president and principal stockholder of Aero-Fab Corporation, which, on June 28,1957, was awarded Contract DA-36-243-QM (CTM)-486 by the United States, Department of Army, Military Clothing & Textile Supply Agency. Albert Turner & Co., Inc., (Turner) agreed to finance the contract,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hawaii v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. ForrestalSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gustavsson Contracting Company v. FloeteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
3Cited by8 opinions
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- John Vishnevsky and Margaret Vishnevsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. ConnorDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1966
- White v. Administrator of General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Rothgeb v. StattsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.