Legal Opinion

Mario Mercado E Hijos (Central Rufina) v. Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 22, 1956No. 12747PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Chief Judge.

Appellant, a producer-processor of sugar in Puerto Rico, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against action of the Secretary of Agriculture under the Sugar Act of 1948, 61 Stat. 922, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1100 ff. The Act authorizes the Secretary to make certain payments, from funds appropriated by Congress, to producer-processors who comply with certain conditions, one of which is that they pay, for beets or cane grown by other producers, not less than rates “that may be determined by the Secretary to be fair and reasonable after investigation and due notice and opportunity…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Garvey v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  2. Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  3. López Luiggi v. Muñoz MarínSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957
  4. United States v. BatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Wilson Dickson v. Mrs. C. O. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API