Legal Opinion

Manley v. Pacific Mill & Timber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1926No. Docket No. 3189PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for the sum of $5,252.20, balance alleged to be due on a certain contract for the sale and purchase of lumber, together with interest thereon at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from the twentieth day of June, 1921. Prom this judgment the defendant appeals.

On the twenty-eighth day of April, 1920, the plaintiff, as the party of the first part, and the defendant, as the party of the second part, entered into a written contract for the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant and purchase by the defendant from the plaintiff of certain lumber to be manufactured by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Slama Tire Protector Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Mix v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. McNeny v. TouchstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Whepley Oil Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Nuland v. PruynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API