Grossetti v. Sweasey
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. Geo. D. Murray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Humboldt Transit Company appeals from a judgment against it in a suit for damages for personal injuries and from the order denying its motion for a new trial. The accident was due to the coming together in violent contact of one of the Transit Company's electric street-cars and a carriage of the "surrey" type belonging to Richard Sweasey, the owner of a livery-stable. Plaintiff was a passenger in the surrey. Sweasey was made a defendant but a nonsuit as to him was granted by the court.
Appellant demurred upon various grounds to each of the six causes of action pleaded. The first two causes…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Chelini v. NieriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Feeney v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Merralls v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.