Legal Opinion

Pacific View Hospital v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1961No. Civ. 25231PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem. *

Petitioners are the defendants in an action brought against them in respondent court by real party in interest wherein she sought damages for alleged slanders. Petitioners here seek a writ of prohibition to command the respondent court to refrain from continuing to entertain the action and “from continuing to refuse to dismiss said action.”

The relevant facts are: On October 19, 1960, real party in interest filed her complaint against petitioners. She failed, however, to file the undertaking required by section 830 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the clerk refused to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Dixon v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Bried v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Becker v. SchmidlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyer v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Hayward Unified School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API