Legal Opinion

Bried v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1938No. S. F. 16000PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Application for writ of mandate. On September 14, 1937, plaintiff Oscar Nelson brought an action in the superior court against J. A. Bried (petitioner herein), as defendant, for damages for alleged slander. Coincident with the filing of the complaint in that action, the plaintiff filed an undertaking for costs in the sum of five hundred dollars, conditioned as required by the pertinent statute, which provides that a defendant in such an action, within ten days after service of summons, may give notice that he excepts to the sureties on the bond and requires their justification before a judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Becker v. SchmidlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Stinson v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kerby v. Hal Roach Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Grimes v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Spence v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API