Legal Opinion

Becker v. Schmidlin

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1908No. S.F. No. 4705PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order dismissing an action. The suit was brought to recover damages for slander, the complaint setting forth several causes ■of action, and it being alleged that the slanderous words were uttered by defendant, of and concerning the plaintiff at various dates between the first day of December, 1904, and the first day of February, 1905. The complaint was filed October 16, 1905, and was accompanied by an undertaking in the sum of five hundred dollars, filed on the same day, in favor of defendant as provided by statute. (Stats. 1871, sec. 1, p. 533.)

Upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dixon v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Smith v. McDermottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Stinson v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Bried v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kiesel v. District Court of Sixth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Sevier CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API