Wasey v. Holbrook
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the "defendant, Edward" Holbrook, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 21st day of January, 1910, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
This action was brought to set aside, as fraudulent'and void, a transfer to the appellant of 750 shares of the capital stock of, W. A. Sturgeon & Co., a Michigan corporation, and to compel him to return to the plaintiff certificates representing 740 shares, and if it were found that he no longer held such certificates and for that, reason it was impossible for him to return the same, that then he be ordered and adjudged to pay to the plaintiff “ as trustee for the creditors of said Sturgeon a sum of money equivalent to the value of said 740 shares of stock.” The answer put in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murtha v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Hubbell v. . HenricksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Harrison v. Obermeyer & Liebmann Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Joslin v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Irving Trust Co. v. ConteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- Peter Barceloux Co. v. BuffumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.