Legal Opinion

Peter Barceloux Co. v. Buffum

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1932No. 6400PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the trustee in bankruptcy to recover property alleged to have been fraudulently transferred by the bankrupt while insolvent, and is predicated upon section 70e of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 USCA § 110(e), and section 3439 of the California Civil Code, which is as follows: “§ 3439. Transfers, etc., with Intent to Defraud Creditors. Every transfer of property or charge thereon made, every obligation incurred, and every judicial proceeding taken, with intent to delay or defraud any creditor or other person of his demands, is void against all creditors…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Murtha v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Valentine v. . RichardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ralston v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re BarcelouxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. In Re DeReusUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1985
  3. Faivret v. First Nat. Bank in RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Buffum v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. BuffumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API