Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Obermeyer & Liebmann Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Obermeyer & Liebmann Brewing Company and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 2d day of March, 1899, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term ; also from a final judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff entered in -said clerk’s office on the 12th day of December,' 1899; also…

Read the full summary

Appeal by the defendants, Obermeyer & Liebmann Brewing Company and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 2d day of March, 1899, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term ; also from a final judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff entered in -said clerk’s office on the 12th day of December,' 1899; also from an order made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in said clerk’s office on the 25th day of February,1899,…

1Opinion of the Court

Sewell, J.:

October 22, 1896, the. defendant Kinsella gave to the defendant Obermeyer & Liebmann Brewing Company a bill of sale of the furniture and stock of liquors in his saloon at-.372., Eighteenth street, borough of Brooklyn.

John T. Willoughby recovered judgment ¡against Kinsella December 28, 1896, for the sum of $624.99. .An execution was issued and.returned unsatisfied, and proceedings supplementary to execution based upon the judgment were instituted in the usual form on September 9, 1897, which resulted in the appointment of the plaintiff as receiver of the property of the judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murtha v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Van Rensselaer v. . Van RensselaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wasey v. HolbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Peter Barceloux Co. v. BuffumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. In re the Will of RaabNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913
  4. North River Mortgage Corp. v. JacobNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API