Legal Opinion

Godbout v. Norton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1977No. 47108PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

After an adverse jury verdict in a 1972 personal injury suit, plaintiff sued the attorney who represented him in the 1972 action for legal malpractice. Plaintiff presented his case against defendant pro se to the trial court and a jury. At the close of plaintiff’s case in chief, the trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding plaintiff’s evidence insufficient as a matter of law to establish malpractice liability. Thereafter represented by counsel, plaintiff moved for a new trial and now appeals from dismissal of the action and the order denying a new trial.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Noltimier v. NoltimierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Blue Water Corp., Inc. v. O'TOOLESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Hoagland v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Noske v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Molever v. RoushCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API