Legal Opinion
Molever v. Roush
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 19, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8045PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
This case incorporates two appeals in one, a direct appeal and a cross-appeal. The case began as a legal malpractice action brought by I.M. Molever (Molever) against attorney, Charles D. Roush and Roush’s law firm, Treon, Wamicke, Dann & Roush, P.A. (Roush). The complaint in malpractice had two counts. Count I alleged negligence and breach of contract by Roush in an action against attorneys Stanley E. Preiser and John F. Brown, Jr. (Preiser & Brown litigation). Count II alleged negligence and breach of contract by Roush in the prosecution of a defamation action against…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Phillips v. ClancyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & StrawnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Elliott v. VideanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.