Legal Opinion

Noltimier v. Noltimier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1968No. 40793PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attempted appeal pro se from an order of the district court in a divorce proceeding pursuant to plaintiff husband’s motion for reduction of support payments and an order' to show cause on behalf of defendant wife why plaintiff should not be required to make payments of such support. The order denied the' motion for reduction of support payments and found plaintiff in contempt for having failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the prior orders for support. It provided “that the defendant shall be remanded to the custody of the Probation Officer of Hennepin County and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Cozik v. CozikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Seerup v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Stowman v. Carlson Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. GRUNDTNER v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Godbout v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API