Hoagland v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Judge.
This case arises from the postconviction court’s denial, in part, of defendant Leland Mark Hoagland’s 1991 petition for postcon-vietion relief under Minn.Stat. ch. 590 (1992). In his petition, Hoagland sought to have his convictions reversed outright or to be granted a new trial based on the following grounds: first, the destruction of the trial court reporter’s notes made review of the legality of his convictions impossible; second, the evidence presented at trial was legally insufficient for conviction for first degree murder; and third, his constitutional rights under…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Henry SelvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Butala v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.