Legal Opinion

Hoagland v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1994No. CX-93-104PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Judge.

This case arises from the postconviction court’s denial, in part, of defendant Leland Mark Hoagland’s 1991 petition for postcon-vietion relief under Minn.Stat. ch. 590 (1992). In his petition, Hoagland sought to have his convictions reversed outright or to be granted a new trial based on the following grounds: first, the destruction of the trial court reporter’s notes made review of the legality of his convictions impossible; second, the evidence presented at trial was legally insufficient for conviction for first degree murder; and third, his constitutional rights under…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. Henry SelvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. FordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Butala v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API