Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1990No. C6-89-2301, C1-89-2254PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

Respondent believed its subrogation action, arising out of a claim it paid for property destroyed in a fire, was nullified when certain evidence from the fire site was discarded. Without pursuing its sub-rogation claim, respondent brought this action alleging tort liability should be imposed on appellants for negligently or intentionally destroying this evidence under a new spoliation tort not yet recognized in Minnesota. In denying appellants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim and for summary judgment, the trial court held the negligent and intentional…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hirsch v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Temple Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Coleman v. Eddy Potash, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API