Legal Opinion
Einbinder v. Board of Tax Review
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 22, 1991No. 14075; 14076; 14077PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole issue in these three consolidated tax appeals is the valuation of an improved but privately owned road for property tax purposes. The *241plaintiffs, Hillard N. Einbinder, Moshe M. Schweky and Joseph R. Pepe, trustee,1 challenged the validity of tax assessments of Woodlake Road2 by the defendant, the Woodbury board of tax review (board).
Because Woodlake Road has never been accepted by the town of Woodbury, it is subject to assessment as private property. Woodbury v. Pepe, 6 Conn. App. 330, 331, 505 A.2d 723 (1986). Pepe’s appeals contested the board’s assessments for the tax years 1983…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Town of Woodbury v. PepeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Pepe v. Board of Tax ReviewConnecticut Superior Court · 1990
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hilton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Adriani v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Daw's Critical Care Registry, Inc. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- BREEZY KNOLL ASS'N. v. Town of MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.