Legal Opinion
Adriani v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 15, 1994No. 14687PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that the commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) had applied correctly the reasonable cause standard to the facts of this case. The plaintiff, John N. Adriani, Sr., appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his claims of procedural irregularities during a hearing before the commission. He claims that the trial court: (1) incorrectly determined that the commission’s investigator (investigator) had properly applied the standard of reasonable cause in his consider*547ation of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- DeBeradinis v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Adriani v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Commissioner of Health Services v. Youth Challenge of Greater Hartford, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Curry v. Allan S. Goodman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Ann Howard's Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Hilton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.