Legal Opinion
Town of Woodbury v. Pepe
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 4, 1986No. 3659PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant is appealing from the judgment of the trial court rendered for the plaintiff after a court trial. The court held the defendant liable for property taxes due on a road and property adja*331cent to that road. The defendant was record owner of both the road and the adjacent property.
The defendant has raised ten claims of error. Six of the claims relate to the trial court’s findings of fact or its failure to find certain facts. Two of the claims relate to conclusions of facts based upon other facts, and the remaining two relate to the court’s ultimate conclusions that the defendant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Hartford v. Faith Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- City of Norwich v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Cooley Chevrolet Co. v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Town of West Haven v. AimesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Town of Westport v. Bossert Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Farmington v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Einbinder v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Tucker v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Waterbury Hotel Equity, LLC v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Pepe v. Board of Tax ReviewConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.