Legal Opinion
Estate of McSweeney
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1951No. Civ. 14739PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The heirs of Daniel McSweeney, deceased, have appealed from an order in probate which awarded to the attorneys for the executor and executrix an allowance upon their statutory fees and $8,175 for extraordinary legal services rendered by them. In their briefs appellants question only the allowance for extraordinary services.
The clerk’s transcript is the sole record upon this appeal. In that record there is disclosed no basis for considering the order except to affirm it, unless we may take judicial notice of certain litigation for the conduct of which this record shows the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Estate of PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Estate of McSweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Pike v. ArchibaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.