Botkin v. Botkin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This proceeding was brought by the defendant husband, Donal B. Botkin, to reduce the amount of alimony required to be paid plaintiff, Helen C. Botkin, under a stipulation embodied in a final divorce decree. The subsequent order of the trial court allowing a reduction in monthly payments is appealed by his wife on the ground that the court abused its discretion and erred as a matter of law in granting a reduction in any amount.
The parties were married on June 8, 1927. The wife was granted a default divorce on January i, 1951, on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment. There…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Hempel v. HempelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Haskell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bryant v. BryantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Arundel v. ArundelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.