Legal Opinion
nCube Corp. v. SeaChange International, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 2, 2011No. C.A. 01-011-LPSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, District Judge:
This patent infringement case, which began in 2001 and resulted in a permanent injunction in 2006, is on the Court’s docket once again. Presently pending before the Court is a motion by plaintiff ARRIS Group, Inc. (“ARRIS”) to hold defendant SeaChange International, Inc. (“Sea-Change”) in contempt of the Court’s 2006 permanent injunction Order. (D.I. 208) The Court held a hearing to determine, under the then-existing state of the law, whether the dispute between ARRIS and SeaChange is amenable to a contempt proceeding. (D.I. 297 at 3) During the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullarkey v. TamboerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- The Lubrizol Corporation v. Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Conoco, Inc. v. Energy & Environmental International, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Stecyk v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Masimo Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/SDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- ePlus Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Ncube Corporation v. Seachange International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Bell v. FarrellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.