Legal Opinion
Bell v. Farrell
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 10, 2020No. 4:17-cv-02020Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID BELL, et al., No. 4:17-CV-02020 Plaintiffs, (Judge Brann) v. MATTHEW R. FARRELL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION JULY 10, 2020 In preparation for trial, the parties have each filed motions in limine.1 I begin by summarizing the legal standard applicable to motions in limine before addressing each issue. I. LEGAL STANDARD Motions in limine are motions made before trial to aid the clear presentation of evidence. “Evidence should only be excluded on a motion in limine if it is clearly inadmissible on all…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Carol Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Charles Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.