The Lubrizol Corporation v. Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, The Lubrizol Corporation (“Lubrizol”) challenges the district court’s order dismissing its complaint on the grounds of claim and issue preclusion. 1 Because we believe this action is barred by applicable principles of claim preclusion, we will affirm.
I
In 1982, Lubrizol filed suit in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Exxon Corporation (“Exxon”) and the Exxon Research and Engineering Co. (“Exxon Research”), alleging patent infringement. In re Lubrizol/Exxon Patent Controversy, Nos. 82-2049 and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- 12 Collier bankr.cas.2d 899, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,345 in Re Teltronics Services, Inc., Debtor. Anaconda-Ericsson Inc., as Successor by Merger to Lm Ericsson Telecommunications, Inc. v. Jules J. Hessen, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Teltronics Services, Inc., Michael M. Rand and Gregory T. Frese, Teltronics Services, Inc., and Edward M. Beagan v. Anaconda-Ericsson Inc., Lm Ericsson Telephone Company, and Ericsson Telecomm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Mullarkey v. TamboerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Banks v. County of AlleghenyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Courteau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Duhaney v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.