Legal Opinion
Ncube Corporation v. Seachange International Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 10, 2013No. 2013-1066PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
On July 31, 2009, ARRIS Group, Inc. (“ARRIS”) 1 filed a motion to hold Sea-Change International Inc. (“SeaChange”) in contempt of a permanent injunction order. The United States District Court for the District of Delaware found that ARRIS failed to meet its burden of showing contempt by clear and convincing evidence and declined to hold SeaChange in contempt. ARRIS appeals. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the contempt motion, we affirm.
I
ARRIS and SeaChange are providers of video-on-demand products and services. ARRIS owns U.S. Patent No.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Harris Corporation v. Ericsson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- R-BOC Representatives, Inc. v. MinemyerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- APEX Financial Options, LLC v. GilbertsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022