Legal Opinion

Hoag v. Fenton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1963No. Calendar 14, Docket 49,714PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff appeals from directed verdict of no cause for action in his suit for damages resulting from the collision between automobiles owned and operated by him and by defendant, respectively. We think judgment below for defendant should be reversed and new trial granted.

Plaintiff was traveling east on a paved, 2-lane, through highway, approaching its intersection with a north and south gravel road. Defendant was traveling south on the gravel road, approaching the intersection from the north. He was required, as indicated by stop sign, to stop before entering upon the paved highway. There is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. United Trucking Service, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cole v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Winslow v. Veterans of Foreign Wars National HomeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Barner v. KishMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Schow v. PaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ingram v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Diamond v. HolsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Green v. RichardsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Desmarais v. MyefskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Diamond v. HolsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API