Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Holstein

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1964No. Calendar 58, Docket 50,320Published

1Opinion of the Court

373 Mich. 74 (1964)

127 N.W.2d 896

DIAMOND

v.

HOLSTEIN.

Calendar No. 58, Docket No. 50,320.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 4, 1964.

Earl T. Prosser and James W. Cowell (Charles R. Cole, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Cary, BeGole & Martin, for defendants.

DETHMERS, J.

Plaintiff, a passenger in a northbound automobile driven by her husband, was injured in a T-intersection collision with a westbound automobile driven by defendant Holstein, owned by defendants Erlandson and occupied by Mrs. Erlandson as a passenger. Plaintiff sued for resultant damages. Decision on plaintiff's motion, made at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Diamond v. HolsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Nabozny v. HamilMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Cole v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Anders v. CloverMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Todd v. SimonisMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API