Legal Opinion

Gettleson v. Lewis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1919No. Docket No. 54PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error, to Wayne; Collingwood, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Jack Gettleson against Amy Neal Lewis for commissions on the sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff is a real estate broker in Detroit, and recovered a judgment in the court below for a commission claimed to have been earned by him. Defendant brings the case here upon a record containing 65 assignments of error, all of which have been examined and but one of'which is well taken. It will therefore be necessary to state only such facts as bear upon this assignment of error. The property involved is located at the corner of Cedarhurst and Woodward avenues, and defendant’s title was re*114stricted, the restriction inhibiting its use for manufacturing purposes or the sale of liquor. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cain v. MasuretteMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Montgomery v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Appleby v. SperlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hynes v. BrettelleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Best v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Frischkorn Real Estate Co. v. HoskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Koffman v. PackMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Casey v. HetheringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Kostan v. GlasierMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API