Legal Opinion

Kostan v. Glasier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1953No. Docket 2; Calendar 44,715PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeti-imers, C. J.

Plaintiff sued for commission for sale of real estate and from judgment of no cause for action appeals.

Each of the 2 defendants owned an undivided one-half interest in the property in question by the entireties with his wife. Plaintiff, a licensed real-estate broker, obtained authority from defendant Glasier to sell the property and, at the same time, learned from him that there were defects in the title and that the 2 wives had interests as tenants by the entireties. Glasier told plaintiff that he did not know whether the wife of defendant Grossman would agree to sell, that he would see her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hannan v. PrentisMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Cain v. MasuretteMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Frischkorn Real Estate Co. v. HoskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Appleby v. SperlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Gettleson v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diamond v. ChiateArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. MAX BROOCK, INC. v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Jakems v. DitmarMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Diamond v. ChiateArizona Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API