Cain v. Masurette
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Earl R. Cain against William F. Masurette for broker’s commissions. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action in assumpsit to recover commissions claimed to be due the plaintiff for effecting a sale of certain real estate belonging to the defendant. On April 9, 1913, the defendant, at the solicitation of the plaintiff, signed and delivered to the plaintiff the following writing:
“April 9, 1913.
“I hereby offer to sell to C. M. Harmon, or his assigns lot nine (9) of block eight (8) of Crane & Wes*9son’s subdivision, said premises having a frontage of thirty-eight (38) feet on the easterly side of Elton Park, and a depth of eighty (80) feet along the northerly side of Elizabeth street,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coleman's Ex'r v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Rice v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Francis v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Love v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- McFarland v. LillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Frischkorn Real Estate Co. v. HoskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Landskroener v. HenningMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Gettleson v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Koffman v. PackMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Beatty v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.