Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Centex Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 2, 1963No. 43,254PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*131The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

In this workmans compensation case the examiner made an award of compensation to the claimant, which was approved by the director of workmen’s compensation. Upon appeal to the district court, findings of fact were made and the court entered its conclusion of law that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of claimant’s employment with Centex Construction Company, Inc., and denied an award of compensation. The claimant has appealed.

The usual preliminary features of a compensation case such as employment, being under the act,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Madison v. Key Work Clothes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Hilyard v. Lohmann-Johnson Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Fougnie v. Wilbert & Schreeb Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Leslie v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Immer and Company v. BrosnahanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  2. Dean v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Moreau v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Laines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Lee v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API