Pearson v. Electric Service Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The district court denied the claim for compensation and the claimant appeals. Respondent was the Electric Service Company of Pensacola, a company engaged in electrical installation business. The name, however, is a trade name only as the company is owned and operated entirely by an individual named Hugh Caffey. The insurance carrier defended the action.
The claimant, Miss Carrie Lou Pearson, was employed by Hugh Caffey as secretary and treasurer, or as assistant office manager, on electrification work…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duncan v. Perry Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Daggett v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Cuero Cotton Oil & Mfg. Co. v. Feeders' Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Kennedy v. Hull & Dillon Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Repstine v. Hudson Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pinkston v. Rice Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Wilkinson v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Taylor v. Centex Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Ward Manufacturing Co. v. MileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- O'BRIANT v. Daniel Construction CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.