Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Murdock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 2010No. SCBD 5542PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHargrave, J.

¶ 1 On June 24, 2009, the Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar) filed a complaint pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP) against Walter D. Murdock alleging violation of Rule 1.3 RGDP, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A. 1 The complaint states that on June 28, 2008, Walter D. Murdock was involved in a situation which resulted in his ultimately entering an Alford plea to the misdemeanor charge of Outraging Public Decency, in violation of 21 O.S. § 22. 2 No additional facts were set forth in the complaint. At the hearing before the Trial Panel of the Professional…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WilburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MiskovskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LAYTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZANNOTTISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CorralesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API