Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
Defendant insurer appeals a summary judgment permitting recovery on the insured’s medical expense insurance policy of hospital and medical expenses paid under the Medicare provisions of the Social Security Act, notwithstanding the policy’s exclusionary and deductible clauses. The correct construction of these clauses is the only issue on this appeal. We affirm.
Defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company issued a so-called “Top-Brass Supplement — Personal Catastrophe Liability” policy to the insured, William W. Wither-spoon, on September 1, 1971. Mr. Witherspoon was then only 2 months…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Black v. American Bankers Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Thompson v. EzzellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Murray v. Western Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Ames v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Bank of California, N. A. v. W. H. Opie, California Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
- United Pacific Insurance v. Van's Westlake Union, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.