Legal Opinion

Ames v. Baker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1966No. 38014PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

“ . . . the Insurer agrees to reimburse the Insured . . . for such reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred ■. . . arising out of an attack of . . . Encephalitis . . . and which first manifests itself during the period of this insurance commencing at noon August 25, 1958 . . . . ” (Italics ours).

The above provision of a “dread disease” insurance policy forms the crux of this action brought by an insured against the designated representative of the Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London. The issue posed is whether the clause “which first manifests itself” refers to “encephalitis” or to “attack.”

Prio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EzzellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Selective Logging Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Davis v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Shotwell v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API