Legal Opinion

Byard v. Harkrider

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1886No. 11,910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Newton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHora, J.

The first error of which complaint is here made by appellant, the defendant below, is thus assigned upon the record of this cause: “ The court erred in overruling the demurrers to the first and second paragraphs of the complaint.”

Appellee’s complaint herein contained three paragraphs. Appellant’s assignment of error, however, only calls in question the sufficiency of the first and second paragraphs of the complaint. There was no demurrer below to the third paragraph of complaint, nor is its sufficiency challenged here by any assignment of error.

In the first paragraph of his complaint appellee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Stanley v. SutherlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Rudolph v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Smith v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Malott v. SampleIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Evansville Hoop & Stave Co. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Barrett v. SippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Evansville & Indianapolis Railroad v. DartingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Fry v. P. Bannon Sewer Pipe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API